Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 11:32
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
6 "Bad" Foods that Could Actually Help Lower Blood Pressure, According to Dietitians - EatingWell
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sapiente nemo autem perspiciatis.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Would you respect the US with a woman as president?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
FDA approves Moderna’s new lower-dose COVID-19 vaccine - AP News
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Hauler Talk: Dissecting the wet-weather tire rules for Mexico City - NASCAR.com
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
EleutherAI releases massive AI training dataset of licensed and open domain text - TechCrunch
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
RKF Jr. May Have Just Ruined Our Best Weapon Against Bird Flu - The Bulwark
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
How do scammers communicate? Do they have a specific language or slang?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years: